Have you ever wondered where did the formula come from for establishing the weight load, number of repetitions and sets that are appropriate for each athlete in strenght training? Fact of the matter is an athlete can lift 50lb sacks of cement mix, throw hay bales or roll tractor tires and get stronger…..that is stronger for lifting 50lb bags of cement mix, throwing hay bales or rolling tractor tires!
Of course in these examples we are refering to Transfer of Training issues which is information for another time. So, back to the question, what is the formula for the appropriate weight load, number of reps and sets for athletes when training with weights. I assume most begin with determining the athletes one repetition maximums.
After establishing one rep maximums the issue of weight loads, reps and sets begins to get really cloudy! When you are weight training for speed and power you cannot use formulas established in popular body building magazines.
In athletes performing in sports which predominatly rely on speed and power it is shown in vatus medialis biopsies they have 50% more fast twitch muscle fibers than body builders. Body builders weight lifting work outs are not the paradigm for establishing weight loads, reps and sets in training for speed and power!
Does anyone know for a fact what is the appropriate weight load, reps and sets that is most effcient and productive when training with weights whether it be for speed, power, strenght, muscle endurance or whatever? I don’t think so! I beleive it mostly is opinion or what some one else has said. Is that how you wish to weight train yourself or your athletes?
So what might be a solution? The athlete determines what is the most efficient and productive for him or herself! Thats right, the athlete. The coach or trainer must understand neuromuscular impulse rates, muscle motor unit firing rates and muscle fiber contraction rates and appropriate lifting methods and techniques. After that they can set the athlete up with a weight training program that demands training each set to near failure or failure.
In the Dynamic Force Weight Training System we refer to the athletes “pain threshold”! On a subjective scale of 1-10, 9 to10 being near failure or failure is the athletes “pain threshold”. But you say, what if the athlete is faking it or quiting before they reach the 9 to 10 “pain threshold” level? So, what if the coach or trainers weight load, rep and set formula does not adequately challenge the athlete or is beyond the capability of the athlete and they quit before completing the weight load,rep,set formula?
In either equation, under challenged or beyond the capability of the athlete, efficiency and productivity is missed. Futhermore, in weight training, under any circumstance, it is the athlete who determines the outcome, not the coaches or trainers formula of weight load, reps and sets.
So, why not put the responsibility on the athletes shoulders and let them learn what is their “pain threshold” and determine the ultimate outcome?Partner your athletes up and let them challenge each other.
Have them experiment with a weight load in which they reach their near failure or failure “pain threshold” within 4-10 repetitions. At the subjective “pain threshold” of 8-9, finish the set with an isometric contraction until failure and have their training partner assist them with racking the bar or dumbell.
Our experience is the athletes “pain threshold” always increases, they can do more than they thought. Is it hard? Absolutely! Only those who are determined to be the best they can be prevail. In the athletes who are not motivated, it does not matter what the coaches or trainers formula for them is, they will not weight train in the most effecient and productive manner possible for optimum results.
It always gets back to the athlete. It is he or she who is responsible for optimum weight training outcomes. Of course a coach or trainers knowledge and passion is important in the process but the ultimate outcome is determined by the athlete. Now that is a fact!